Authors’ reply to the comment by Kendall et al.

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reply to Comment by Young et al.

Had our study been, as Young et al. imply, a data trawling exercise using hundreds of variables to look for a 'thread', then doubts about its validity might be justified. However, their account of our work bears little relationship to the methods, results or conclusions we report. For example, Young et al. claim that we used 396 tests to address our primary hypothesis. In fact, we used two. You...

متن کامل

Commentary: A Comment on Qi et al.—Authors’ Reply

We appreciate the thoughtful comments from Dr. Jack Fowler on our recent manuscript of an estimation of radiobiological parameters for head and neck cancer (HNC) and the clinical implications [1]. [...].

متن کامل

Reply to Frizzell et al.’s comment to our comment

I agree with O’Brien et al.’s comment to our comment of their paper that in order for there to be inertial cavitation, the nuclei must be smaller than resonant size, and therefore less than 2 mm in diameter, much smaller than the mean alveolar diameter. Yet it seems entirely unreasonable to suggest that not a single such small nuclei exist in the immediate vicinity of the alveoli sacs, which ar...

متن کامل

Reply Response to Comment by Bence et al .

We welcome the opportunity to respond to the Comment of Bence et al. (2000) regarding the suitability of the new geochemical parameter we have introduced. Part of their comment, however, addresses issues either not directly related to our paper, or issues published elsewhere. The lengthy comment seems a disproportionate reaction to what was a paper of limited scope, simply introducing one new g...

متن کامل

Reply to the Comment of Crossley et al. (2014)

1. If SG can be compared with GRACE, considering the resolution of GRACE, there should be “common” signal between the SGs themselves in Europe. The first method is to look for correlation between the SGs, of which the significance can only be tested after removing the annual component 2. Then, we explain that, in the framework of this study, the EOF tool does not provide usable results, with or...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Pain

سال: 2018

ISSN: 1090-3801

DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1208